Drama Urge

Serenading Louie
Home
Articles
Applause Meter
Interviews
Archives
Disclaimer
About/Contact Me

An American Tragedy

RobinTedandVanessa.jpg
Theordore Snead relives his glory days with Vanessa Bradchulis as Robin Covington looks on (right)

HansandVanessa.jpg
Hans Dettmar (as Carl) asks Vanessa Bradchulis (as Mary) not to take her love to town

There's a French proverb that says to the effect that "In love, there is always one who kisses and another who offers the cheek."  That's the issue with the two dysfunctional couples lying at the heart of Lanford Wilson's 1970 (revised 1976) play Serenading Louie now being presented at The American Century Theater (to 8/21). 

On the one hand, there's Carl (Hans Dettmar) a successful developer who pours everything into his relationship with wife Mary (Vanessa Bradchulis); on the other, there's Gabby (Robin Covington) who sucks everything out of hers with attorney husband Alex (Theodore M. Snead).   

Serenading Louie - the title taken from the Yale Whiffenpoff Song - hearkens back to the sunny rites of college and the optimism of youth, a time to which everyone in the play's world would like to return.

Director Stephen Scott Mazzola has mounted a somewhat understated, uneven, and at times expressionistic production in an effort to capture Mr. Wilson's introspective, character-driven play.  The staging with expository asides delivered to the audience and overlapping dialogue at the conclusion - where separate members of each couple converse - reflect the shared consciousness of the characters and lend an intimacy to the performance.  

The scenic design of Deborah Wheatley, with brown-orange color palette, has a faded and dingy look to it, which together with the monotonous lighting of Andrew Griffin and the popular 20s-40s sound of Matt Otto evoke an era of living, if not being frozen, in the past.  Only the costumes of Frank Labovitz bring some pizzazz to this picture.       

Best buds Carl and Alex seem like a pair of weary players running out the clock on their respective marriages in the opening scenes.  Only when they meet together over snacks and some brews, along with a sporting ritual, a rerun of the Super Bowl (it was new then!), do the male confidences fly.  Both are unhappy with their lives, either with their careers, which they are pursuing full-tilt with unsatisfying results, or their wives, manifested in their respective sex lives.  Carl's is essentially shut down while Alex is withstanding what he perceives to be a continuing blitz.  There's a lot of talk of when, where, and how much they like it, which even given the nature of those frank and venturesome times, does not ring all together true.  After much telling and not much showing, we find out (here and later) that infidelity is symptomatic of the malaise.  But the larger issue is the sense they make of the past.  For Carl it is was a moment he wants to recapture (if not return to) as it was then; for Alex, it offers the promise of the best to come.  Each as it turns out is illusory.      

Act II picks up the pace (in tempo with Mr. Otto's discordant strings) with some upbeat socializing between both couples following a night on the town.  This alcohol-laced segment jump starts the action like so many happy hours with an open bar. The drink they are sharing here is not loneliness, but nostalgia. Mr. Snead infuses Alex with an energy that plays well off the equally vibrant Ms. Bradchulis and the believably enabling Ms. Covington.  Even Mr. Dettmar's depression prone Carl rallies with a turn in mask. 

At first glance it would appear that the balance of power lies one way or the other depending on who possesses that discrete object of desire.  It develops, however, that that the arrangement between each of the couples is reciprocal and it's neither monetary nor sexual per se. Men provide the stories and idealism which the women, living in the present with blinders - they can't stand very much reality - use to sustain their illusions.  In return, the men get some form of anchoring, and boy do they need it! 

There's also discontent revealed here from Mary, who's been keeping her options open, as we find out, from day one.  The pervasive, non-stop attention of Carl has taken its toll, and she questions the "feeding your life into someone else's veins - whoever can bear to accept it anyway?"  Mary's toted up the marital balance sheet and found it wanting. There will be a few more revelations and a startling ending to the night's festivities which, if not always clear, due to the constraints of the set design, will be emphatic.  There may be some unresolved issues on your mind, but closure will not be one of them.   

Mr. Wilson's script saddles the male characters with a lot of exposition.  Even with the best of casting, and TACT and the actors have done a commendable job, it would be difficult to pull off completely.  Carl in particular has half a dozen extended stories which we and the characters have to wade through, while Alex's continuing saga of unfulfillment grows old early.  When the men are paired with their stage wives (or conversing across space-time with their opposites), the language and emotions ring truer.  The ladies fare better.  Ms. Covington is riveting as Gabby, fleshing out a role which on paper seemed nothing more than an emotionally needy spouse.  And Ms. Bradchulis gives a clipped and sensitive portrayal of Mary whose world is slowly being chipped away.           

Generational references abound and it should be noted that characters of the play fit right between The Greatest Generation and The Baby Boomers, two cohorts with considerable clout.  Mr. Wilson's play, a bit verbose by today's standards, nonetheless still travels well.  Though situated in the seventies in Chicago, it really could take place any time, any place.  If anything, these themes are even more relevant today in a violent 24/7 world, where those bygone days look as appealing as ever.   

***************************************************************************************************************************

Sound check: Very good, with low to mid-sound levels muffled only by the limitations of the space.

Program notes:  Excellent; along with the nominally priced Audience Guide (free to subscribers) and the informative podcast on their website (www.americancentury.org), you will be fully prepared.

Applause meter:  3 hands for comparable Non-Equity productions.  Recommended for those theatergoers looking to see an American Classic on its feet, are unacquainted with the work of Lanford Wilson, or seeking greater exposure to the craft of playwrighting. TACT continues to entertain and educate a discerning audience.       

Runtime: About 2 hours and 15 minutes with an intermission.

Photo credits: Dennis DeLoria

© John F. Glass July 30, 2010